After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies have become reviving these systems. From lie detection tools examined at the edge to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being used by asylum applications. This article explores how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to work these systems and to follow their legal right for safeguard.

It also demonstrates how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from being able to view the stations of safeguard. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are regimented by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: www.ascella-llc.com/portals-of-the-board-of-directors-for-advising-migrant-workers while they assist to expedite the asylum procedure, they also help to make it difficult for the purpose of refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.